First order of business:
I am loving this blogging business. It's like Facebook, but a bit more low key...so I feel less obnoxious going on and on about things going on in my life.
So, assuming that BPD is my community partner
1.) The relationship between citizens and my community partner is one that exists by virtue of our federal republic. The police department exists for community safety and security. The police department also serves as a link between citizens and the legal system itself.
2.) Citizens and the police department interface in cases of
-Law violation
-Security/follow up
-Arrests
They are the level of government citizens interact with in legal situations.
Police officers are even available to tell you directions. They are in place as liaisons of the law for the people.
3.) Citizen participation through voting may or may not have major impacts on the police department. Perhaps through tax evasion, the police department would suffer from citizen non participation.
So. I've finally gotten in contact with the chief. (His secretary at least)
Who knew city police chiefs are so busy and tricky to reach?!
I have a meeting with him tomorrow to discuss finalizing activities for outreach as we are required to start our positions this week.
Anyway,
1.) What are some of the advantages and disadvantages of the winner-take-all system?
2.)It is self-evident that a republic and bureaucracy go hand in hand...Government and bureaucracy go hand in hand for that matter. What effect would direct democracy have on the culture of bureaucracy and what inconveniences could it cause for state and local institutions?
3.) What effect would direct democracy have on participation?
